When you are finished with Day Ten click the back button to return to this page.
Transcript Analysis
Day 10, August 29, 2006
-
Page 5-6 state is attempting to submit evidence not included in the list of evidence to be used to trial under rule 15.1 (b) evidence is inadmissible. Mistrial. No Hobson's choice.
Tammy Radmacher
-
Page 25-5 sticker on a posted rules sign at Porter Park.
Rhonda Kennedy
-
Page 34-19 How does Rhonda Kennedy know what other witnesses have been saying? Violation of rules of exclusion. Mistrial. No Hobson's choice.
-
Page 35-6 She remembers photos were more colorful. Perjury. Day 9, Page 69-7, 71-7.
-
Page 37-17 Rhonda can't remember at least half of the pictures.
-
Page 38-15 Rhonda can't identify subjects in photos.
-
Page 39-10 She can't identify exhibits as being what Joanne showed her.
-
Page 39-24 She only saw 1 photo.
-
Page 40-5 She refused to look at police photos.
-
Page 40-15 Photos please showed her today don't look like the one she saw in 1999.
-
Page 42-23 Pictures were black and white.
-
Page 43-6 Testimony tainted because Joanne told her about the photos she saw in 2003.
-
Page 43-14 Joanne upset because her ring wasn't a real diamond. She obviously must have tried to cash it in to know that.
-
Page 46-14 She doesn't recognize the photos.
-
Page 47-2 The ring defendant gave her belonged to another woman and wasn't a real diamond.
-
Page 48-20 No bruising.
-
Page 48-24 Nobody identified the child in the photos.
-
Page 50-8 Even Joanne didn't identify the subjects in the photos. Perjury. Day 10, Page 51-7.
-
Page 51-7 Joanne identified subjects in photos. Perjury. Day 10, Page 50-8.
Sgt. Bailey
-
Page 53-10 No reminder Sgt. Bailey was still under oath.
-
Page 55-19 Joanne called Brandy after the conclusion of her questioning with Alan Simpson and police, while police or on their way to interview Brandy. Bailey was told us by Alan Simpson. Perjury. Day 8, Page 161-12.
-
Page 58-6 Brandy said, "I know about the Polaroids."
-
Page 58-16 A black sheet with a hole covered up? What's this all about?
-
Page 58-24 Bailey reports Joanne said it was Luke covered in a blanket.
-
Page 61-18 No reports defendant ever bruised his children.
-
Page 62-2 Bailey never investigated defendant for the murder of Mikelle Biggs. Why not? The writer appeared to possess information about that crime.
-
Page 62-18 There is no way a copy of a photo is better than an original. All copies are degraded to some degree in the copy process.
-
Page 68-15 How is a magic marker dot on a kids wrist going to disguise anybody?
-
Page 69-3 So what!
-
Page 70-3 No Egyptian writing.
-
Page 70-24 No writing on subjects leg.
-
Page 71-16 Brandy said there were three Polaroids to Bailey. Perjury. So far we have reports of 1 photo Day 10, Page 39-24 and 4 photos some place I can't find.
-
Page 72-1 Bailey didn't know who's the subject in the photos was.
-
Page 74-1 Kellen has surgery scar. Bailey didn't know about that up to now and has never been identified in any of the photos. Great detective work!
-
Page 75-5 Mom told Brandy it was Luke and Brandy believed it.
-
Page 77-13 Bailey picked up sleeping bag from Brandy on Feb. 12, 2003.
-
Page 80-2 Who is Todd Whitney?
-
Page 81-15 Brandy early on changed her story about finding pictures.
-
Page 83-11 Joanne found a playgirl photo in the mailing envelope.
-
Page 85-8 Joanne found two or three pictures in an envelope and burned them.
-
Page 85-25 Bailey didn't talk to Dr. Burgoyne.
-
Page 112-7 It is not possible for copies to be any better than the originals. Something’s not right here.
-
Page 117-9 Kellen has a hernia scar. Bailey can't find one.
-
Page 118-15 Bailey never asked Joanne or Brandy if they saw bruises on the kids.
-
Page 124-20 Bailey compared to 35mm photos with originals. Perjury. Day 9, Page 118-17.
-
Page 129-17 Some time passed before Betty and Nikko could be interviewed.
-
Page 130-12 Betty and Nikko reported being shown an adult magazine photo at the same time they were shown Polaroids by Joanne.
-
Page 133-11 How did Bailey have information that the typewriter was not the line used to make the sticker is when it hadn't been tested by Kreitl yet and Joanne insisted she saw, "meticulously typed stickers"?
-
Page 136-20 Originally she thought my info as was Kellen. Why did she change her mind and her testimony?
-
Page 137-4 Again, only parents molest their children.
-
Page 139-13 Joanne tells Bailey and Roemer about the magic marker that defendant supposedly told her about. It also them believe she is truthful because they want to believe. Real detective work here. Always cross-reference and verify and never assume the truth. These people are not detective's.
-
Page 139-21 This is not independent information because it is not from the source and not from and uninvolved party. Hearsay.
-
Page 143-7 A court order for additional handwriting samplar was requested.
-
Page 143-11 The court refused to grant the order. Error!
-
Page 144-24 Exhibit 26 has Judge Roberts address on it.
-
Page 145-11 Exhibit 28 has Roberts phone number on it and his position in the church.
-
Page 151-6 Bailey was never told anything about a birthmark.
-
Page 151-14 The phrase "little boy Blue" Bailey encountered as a U.S.P.S. Inspector and is specific to pedophiles exchanging photos through the mail.
-
Page 152-15 Bailey was aware Rhonda's husband would not support her being interviewed so he and less terror at the grocery store where she would be away from her husband, hoping for some juicy tidbit of information he could distort for his purposes.
For questions or comments about this web site contact: jcoghill2@cox.net
